Ah, very good point <vague sarcasm> and all safty testing has been done. To
top it all off we've even got more in the works just to be extra sure.
I'm quite confident of it's safty. I'm here in complete integrity.
>I can understand why it becomes an impossible event to accomplish the proper
>research, for it would cost a considerable sum of money. But is it fair to
>John Q. Public to sell something that has not been tested in a proper manor?
>Let's face it, we are not talking about dirt for the flower garden.
>
>You are the one who will have to face the judgement day if someting goes
>wrong, not me.
>
>I say this a friend, for unknowingly, you are your own enemy.
I'm very willing to handle whatever happens. And if I wasn't my own
enemy (ie. we all sometimes make self defeating mistakes) then I'd never
learn anything would I <G>? Although I don't agree with your statement in the
context it's in whatsoever.
Joe, I think you're maybe a little too into finding whats wrong with the world
as opposed to whats right.
If thought that EG was going to hurt anyone I would never have some near it.
Ian
--Ian Kelley (iank@teleport.com)ONE Enterprises hompeage (http://www.teleport.com/~iank)PO BOX 604 Newport, OR 97365Voice- 503.265.3075FAX - 503.265.8680