>Can you supply a reference to a QUANTUM physicist who has published such?
>I can only speak for myself, but I need more that he, they, them, give me WHO?
Joe,
This is a start in the direction of the reference material we said we would
attempt to provide in terms of quantum physiscs postulates in terms of mind
(as in the thoughts of researchers) being a part of the experiment itself.
We are also looking to provide some experimental results that back the
theory up if possible.
We have uploaded the following files to Binga's FTP site and posted notice
on that forum also.
Some basic information on the contents of these files follows below.
"It is argued on the basis of certain mathematical characteristics that
classical mechanics (physics) is not constitutionally suited to accommodate
consciousness, whereas quantum mechanics is. These mathematical
characteristics pertain to the nature of the information represented in the
state of the brain, and the way this information enters into the dynamics."
Prepared for a Special Issue of "Psyche"
"This work was supported by the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office
of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Division of High Energy Physics of the
U. S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC03-76SF00098."
Download___Stapp1.txt, Stapp2.txt, Stapp3.txt, Stapp4.txt, Stapp5.txt,
Stapp6.txt, Stapp7.txt
While this paper does not reflect the position of all quantum physicists by
any means, it does demonstrate a scientific approach to what we understand
as 'mystical' or 'metaphysical' principles. If one considers carefully what
is being said by Henry Stapp, it can be seen that the premise David Hudson
has postulated in regards to the belief of the alchemist/researcher being a
part of the entire equation of success in reproducing his results, becomes
infinitly more plausible.
Simeon and Maia
Crest In The Stone Mystery School