Atomic Spin & Multi-Dimensionality

John E. Myers ( (no email) )
Wed, 5 Jun 1996 9:38:56 EST5EDT

Hi,
I came across this posting on the Net. I don't think anyone would mind my reposting it
here and I think someone may find it interesting.
-----------------

Subject: Schrodinger Confirmed; support for Alternative Universe Theories.

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

X-PMFLAGS: 34078848 0

news:31AC5C67.556ED4B7@earthops.org

klaatu <root@earthops.org> wrote:

>This just in.

>

>In the curent issue of _Science Magazine_ (AAAS)

>

>http://science-mag.aaas.org/science/scripts/display/short/272/5265/1101.html

>

>You'll find an intersting little blurb regarding the discovery of a

>"schizophrenic atom" or 'Schrodinger's Kitten'.

>

>Schrodinger's Cat, as most of you should know, is a classic though

>experiment designed to demonstrate to the layman the fact that universes are

>created at each subatomic event.

>

>A cat is placed into a box, with a poison capsule and a device designed to

>break the capsule when the splitting of a radioactive isotope is detected.

>At the time when the isotope is statistically 50-50 regarding decay, one

>says that there is a 50-50 chance that the cat is dead. Is it alive or is it

>dead? goes the classic though experiment. Neither? Actually, sort of both...

>two universes exist, in one of which the cat lives, in the other it is dead

>or dying (considered to be the same for the sake of argument).

>

>You simply cannot tell until you look into the box. There's some

>derivational logic which insists that both the cat and the observer exist in

>a quantum flux, as it were, where the cat is both and neither alive and/or

>dead. Of course, the second you look into the box, you determine in which

>universe you lie.

>

>Scientists at the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) in

>Boulder, Colorado, have demonstrated that it is possible to be in two places

>at the same time, or more properly, it is possible for tow discrete and

>opposite quantum states to exist in the same timespace, or possibly (this

>has yet to be determined) to bridge 'dimensions' or possibly (and this is

>more germane to those who want to believe that we're being invaded by

>'interdimensional elves' <grin>) that it is possible to force universes of

>different outcome to cohabit not only the same space but the same

>reference-frame. In effect, this is a clear and clean fully-documeted

>demonstration that gateways between realities are not only possible, but

>do-able, if costly.

>

>The researchers trapped and supercooled a single beryllium atom that was

>missing one of its two outer electrons. they then poked it with just enough

>laser energy to place it halfway between two spin states. Normally, these

>states would be superimposed on each other, just like the dead/alive

>Schrodinger's Cat at the moment of statistacal 50-50 probabilty of the

>trigger isotope splitting, each with an equal probability of occurring.

>

>The NIST team nudged the atom with laser beams at just the right radiation

>to affect the spin-state in an opposite (presumably mutually-exclusive) way.

>Incredibly, the two states sepereated _into two physical locations dozens of

>times wider than the atom itself. the beryllium ion that was once neither

>here nor ther was now in two distinct places at once.

>

>the cat's outta th' bag, folks.

>

>-------------------------------------------------------

>

>Interestingly, this is quite similar to a concept expressed in a SF novel

>about 20 years ago, by one Dr. Alan Nourse, who predicted that

>interdimensional access (to a 4-d universe, in this case) would be effected

>accidentally through a search for absolute zero. He expanded this concept

>literarily to propose that the supercooled element (unspecified)

>latticed-out into a hypercube array, and this might allow the first

>functional 'transmatter' or matter transmitter.

>

>--------------------------------------------------------

>

>How does this affect speculation on such matters as the Philadelphia

>Experiment conjecture? Who th' heck knows? But in my opinion, this certainly

>opens the doorway for speculation on hyperspace travel. without the need for

>anchored wormholes, or flatspace access.

>

>One might hypothesize that if an atom could be made to exist in two places

>at one, in effect this is quantum tunnelling on the order of wormhole

>transactions between event horizons of rotating black holes.

>

>One might also hypothesize that could a planar array of bilocated atoms (my

>term, gimme credit!) be generated and could energies be somehow applied to

>control the distances between the tow locations of the same atom, one could

>perhaps achieve either temporal or dimensional travel by moving at right

>angles to the plane, or by moving through the olume defined by the planes of

>seperation between the planar surfaces of bilocated planar arrays.

>

>I sure do wish I understood the math, I'd like to try to work on this

>further.

>

>Have fun!

>--

>klaatu

>my sig is borken!

J.E.M. / "All things come to
myersj@gactr.uga.edu / he who waits."
alt.immortal / I have time. Q