If by QED you imply that you have proven EG poison and Monatomic
theory false, I beg to differ. Here are a few loose ends you seem to be leaving.
1. What about the chemist Mr. Hudson worked with whom went to Germany and
gained NOTARIETY by 'his' discovery of precious metals from natural
sources. Has anyone asked Mr. Hudson the name of this gentleman so that
we can look up the journals he was supposedly written up in?
2. Why does the monatomic Iridium work in the United Technologies fuel cell?
Standard chemical analysis detects no Iridium. Yet after a period of time in
the fuel cell, Iridium is detected. Why is this? Is there a way of
tracking this lead for validity?
3. Joe, do you completely understand the harmonic resonance phenomenon that
is supposedly the working principal of EG. Do you have scientific
evidence that refutes this principal in relation to EG?
4. Is EG radioactive? If not, how can Uranium be found in analysis but no
radioactivity be detected?
Leave now if you must Joe; but please don't imply that you have proven
anything yet.
Regards;
Dennis C. Lee
At 01:40 AM 6/4/96 -0700, you wrote:
>
>To members of both forums, I apologize for dominating the discussions. This
>was not my intent, nor desire when asked to join.
>
>I feel that my point has been placed within the annals of these groups. I
>offer my full support to Binga who had the nerve to enter into the lion pit
>and Dan who felt that there should be more.
>
>Judging myself, I am a competent researcher. I understand that we, as a
>civilization, have just entered the learning curve. Without mercy, I have
>challenged suppliers and supporters of different esoteric products. Is it
>truly WPG or EG, I do not know, nor care.
>
>The supporters say it is safe and science does not comprehend. Let it be so.
>Also, there are those who say the paradigm keeps only for its own.
>
>The reality is -- science is a game of numbers. Epidemiological studies are
>the root of our medical foundation. We learn more from the dead than the
>living. In science, it is a form of demographics. In life, it may be your
>spouse, parents or children.
>
>Is there something outside the realm of our universe? Who knows. I am not
>qualified to answer. If there is something out there, I do question if
>society (as we know it) is able to accept.
>
>In my plight I have targeted certain individuals. At first, this was not my
>intent. My goal was to share the limited knowledge given to me with all,
>but it soon turned into a quest.
>
>My drive is not to prove someone wrong, but to allow the living to live.
>
>There is something to David's observations. Being honest (and as a
>scientist), he has been misguided in what it is. This is not important,
>unknowingly he has made a contribution to science.
>
>Since the development of the human race, when man could not provide
>fundamentals, he assumed that a higher being was involved. This is a trait
>of our origin.
>
>You must be your own judge. From the earth we came and unto the earth we
>shall return. This is not religion but a fact of the time and space we
>occupy. I cannot offer anymore than to say the wisdom of science is not
>shadowed by the paradigm. However, before it (science) speaks, it must have
>the ability to observe the truth.
>
>With respect to the forum moderators and the members of such, I bid my
>resignation,
>_______________________________
>Joe Champion discpub@netzone.com
>http://www.netzone.com/~discpub
>
>
>