Re: quod erat demonstrandum

Carlos Motta ( t81562@stress13.dehavilland.ca )
Tue, 4 Jun 1996 12:17:39 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: Eugene: "Re: quod erat demonstrandum"
Next message: MetaSyn@aol.com: "Re: Thoth et al"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Champion: "quod erat demonstrandum"
Next in thread: Dennis C. Lee: "Re: quod erat demonstrandum"

>>I really see no reason for you to resign. You are actually asking the
>>questions that a LOT of us want answered.
>>
>>Please re-admit yourself and continue!
>>
>>Sincerely,
>>Eugene C. Zinter
>>
>>

Agreed.

Carlos Motta.

Previous message: Eugene: "Re: quod erat demonstrandum"
Next message: MetaSyn@aol.com: "Re: Thoth et al"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Champion: "quod erat demonstrandum"
Next in thread: Dennis C. Lee: "Re: quod erat demonstrandum"