Regards;
Dennis C. Lee
At 11:56 PM 6/2/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Joe Champion writes:
>> At 05:39 PM 6/2/96 MDT, you wrote:
>> >In other words, would it not be better to approach this from the perspective
>> >that Hudson really has come upon something highly unusual, and focus the
>...
>> I am being synical, but come on. All that we as "want-to-be-believers" need
>> is a little proof. It was not I who stated that M.I.T. tested a product for
>> ORME's. Nor, was it I who stated that A&L Labs provided analyses for white
>> gold, green gold and red gold! Nor, was it I was stated that others had
>> replicated tests.
>
>I am willing to suspend disbelief so long as that trust is not
>violated. But it is becoming ever clearer to me that all is not
>well here. If we do not do out best to verify any claims that are
>verifiable and hold those making such claims responsible then
>researchers will avoid this subject like the plague. And, despite
>my experiences so far, I still believe that there is something
>interesting going on here, whatever it may be.
>
>Every person must demand the truth for themselves.
>
>I have asked Sunshine Services (ISIS WPG) twice now about their
>analysis and I have been totally ignored by them [consider this
>yet another request -- as I'm sure they would claim they have never
>heard anything from me]. I have also asked Ian Kelly of ONE
>Enterprises (Etherium Gold) at least three times for this information
>and he has not told me anything beyond that it was at "MIT" (which
>I obviously already know, that doesn't help). Surely if "MIT" has
>confirmed monatomics in those products that the vendors should
>easily be able to give me the info about who did it so I can confirm
>it with the lab. Why is this not the case?
>
>A Public Challange:
>
>I will buy $250 worth of product from the first company that can
>produce a verifiable photocopy of a lab report indicating the
>presence of high-spin monatomic iridium, rhodium, platinum, palladium,
>mercury, silver, or gold in their product (i.e., I get to call the
>lab and speak with someone technical enough to confirm not only
>that some assay was done but can speak towards the veracity of the
>results -- the claimant must provide all required information so
>that I can do this). I will also publicly post my support and
>prominently feature that company on my web site.
>
>If a lab can test for high-spin monatomic elements as they claim
>then it *should* be a simple enough matter to verify this.
>
>This information is also now on my web site,
>in the "Commercial Products" file, off of:
> http://monatomic.earth.com/
>
>