Ian said in a private email rebuttal:
>I'm not trying to enter into an argument here, I simply want to reach an
>understanding...
>
I asked previously:
>>
>>You say that his (I assume that you mean Dr. Richard Breitbarth) opinion is
>>not based on actual knowledge of the stuff ( assume you mean EG). If that
>>is the case, why did he acknowledge the above assay? Was the above material
>>not EG?
Ian answered:
>Yes it was, I was saying that his knowledge of the product itself, and other
>research involved was limited. His implication that peoples response to EG
>was some kind of near death experience was a little bit humorous... If that
>was the case then people would be dying left and right...
>
I stated previously:
>>You say that there has not been ONE CASE OF TOXICITY, how can you state this
>>with certainty? People live for years with lead poisoning and are unaware.
>>No one checks the cadavers to see -- well this one died from lead, this one
>>from a train, and this one from white gold!
Ian replied:
>Let me put it this way... Everything anyone has experienced because of EG
>has been the exact opposite of the symptoms they would experience from
>heavy metal poisoning. We are currently having extensive research done
>that will prove this once and for all. I am currently quite positive of
>this fact, however...
>
Yes, a previous statement from me:
>>Ian, I am not the one who is making assumptions. You are stating something
>>that has no fundamental credentials.
>>
>>Forget me, why don't you tell the users what's in the potion.
>>
>>In the report from Dr. Richard Breitbarth, he stated that the sample
>>contained a combined quantity of 614 ppm's metals. Using standard logic,
>>this equates to 0.0614%.
>>
>>Now bear with me, my fundamental question is if Dr. Breitbarth says that
>>0.0614% of the sampled analyzed was "the elusive monatomics," what in the
>>heck makes up the other 99.938% of the material that you are
>selling????????????
Ian stated with the utmost certainty:
>Over 70 other trace minerals... I love to send you a copy but I don't have
>the time to answer every post claiming that this or that in EG has done
>this or that bad thing to people. I do make this info available to people
>who ask, BTW... What it really comes down to is that even from your
>standpoint everything in EG is in safe levels...
>
Attempting to reply along with giving full honor's to the owner of the
non-moderated forum and having a greater understanding of binga's plight in
attempting to edit I must revert to a two syllable non-scientific word:
BULLSHIT...
You have spun your own web on the WEB Ian. Of course, I could be
misinformed. However, if 99.938 percent of your EG is only trace minerals,
what's the rest? Oh, maybe I owe someone an apology, for I forgot about the
non-metallic's. Yes -- HOT AIR.
If you are quite sure no one has experienced heavy metal poisoning, would
you be kind enough to give us the name of the medical doctor who made this
observation?
Before closing I must reply to your last sentence....No, sorry, I want to,
but problems in my back will not let me stoop that low.
(Ralph Nader, eat your heart out, not EG)
_______________________________
Joe Champion discpub@netzone.com
http://www.netzone.com/~discpub