>>Biophase Systems has been established since 1987 to produce and test various
>>substances relating to colloids for biological purposes.
>>
>>Dr. Breitbarth is a "main-stream" scientist and lives by the rules of
>>PHYSICS as understood by current teachings.
>>
>>His interruption of "monatomic" is -- a molecule consisting of "ONE ATOM!"
>>
IAN KELLY REPLIED:
>Please realize that his opinion is not based on any actual
>knowledge of the product, in fact I was not aware of this opinion
>until now.
>
>You are very wrong in your statement that there is a dangerous
>level of any toxin in Etherium Gold. There is nothing in EG that
>even the FDA would consider to be in toxic levels.
>
>One important fact is that an element in the monatomic state does
>not have metal-metal bonding properties, leaving no chance of
>build up in the body.
>
>People have been taking EG, some in very large doses, for years.
>There has not been ONE case of toxicity. If there were any chance
>of this then a lot of people would be dead by now, including myself.
>
>The above mentioned scientist is entitled to his opinion, but it is
>not based on fact.
>
>Please don't mis-lead people because of an assumption...
>
JOE CHAMPION's REBUTTAL:
Mr. Pat Bailey
Etherium Technology
530 3rd Street
Suite A
Newport, OR 97365
Dear Mr. Bailey:
We received a sample of your Etherium Gold on October 2, 1995, receiving No.
OAR-1-3964. As per your request, a monatomic analysis of the material was
performed to ascertain the presence and relative ppm of the following
compounds: Gold, Silver, Chromium, Platinum, Iridium and Rhodium.
[snip....]
You say that his (I assume that you mean Dr. Richard Breitbarth) opinion is
not based on actual knowledge of the stuff ( assume you mean EG). If that
is the case, why did he acknowledge the above assay? Was the above material
not EG?
I can accept your lack of knowledge in the realm of molecular science, but
you are incorrect when you state that a monatomic atom as used in the
terminology as prescribed by Dr. Richard Breitbarth does indeed have METAL
TO METAL bonding properties. FYI -- his monatomic state is taking a bonded
state and tearing it apart. This same state rebounds to form colloidal and
post-colloidal particles instantaneously. You are not applying real science
to your statements.
You say that there has not been ONE CASE OF TOXICITY, how can you state this
with certainty? People live for years with lead poisoning and are unaware.
No one checks the cadavers to see -- well this one died from lead, this one
from a train, and this one from white gold!
Ian, I am not the one who is making assumptions. You are stating something
that has no fundamental credentials.
Forget me, why don't you tell the users what's in the potion.
In the report from Dr. Richard Breitbarth, he stated that the sample
contained a combined quantity of 614 ppm's metals. Using standard logic,
this equates to 0.0614%.
Now bear with me, my fundamental question is if Dr. Breitbarth says that
0.0614% of the sampled analyzed was "the elusive monatomics," what in the
heck makes up the other 99.938% of the material that you are selling????????????
_______________________________
Joe Champion discpub@netzone.com
http://www.netzone.com/~discpub