>Now for the other-dimensional perspective. We will state that our source of
>information is Thoth, also known as Tehuti. He is most well known for his
>association with the Great Pyramid and the early (pre-dynasty) Egyptian
>epoch. The channel for this source is my wife and partner Maia, who has=
been
>channeling for 28 years. It is the only thing she has ever done in her=
life,
>period. She has had meetings with one of the astronauts who went to the
>moon, at the Houston NASA Space Center in regards to her
>spiritual-scientific information on physics beyond the speed of light. We
>offer this bit of background to differentiate the process she works with
>from what is generally being called channeling in the metaphysical=
community.
With all due respect, I can=92t see how this distinguishes your esteemed=
wife
from the rest of the channelling community.=20
>Thoth has indicated that the naturally occurring powders are working on a
>somewhat different principle than is the Orme Hudson has produced. He has
>said that there is an etheric molecule (he calls iropiya) that is most
>likely undetectable by current scientific methods at this time, that is a
>main component of the naturally occurring powder's action. As such, the
>action of the natural powders will be more subtle and not reliant upon=
gross
>levels of monoatomics being present. Those who are devoting themselves to
>spiritual evolution of the self, thereby bringing themselves to an=
awareness
>of subtler realms of energy will more easily detect this action etc etc.=20
This may even be true, but since Thoth has advised that the =91etheric
molecule=92 is =91most likely undetectable by current scientific methods at=
this
time=92, believers in Etherium Gold will have to take this etheric molecule=
on
faith until more scientific methods are developed. It also may be that
Thoth, taking pity on said believers, has provided a useful psychological
rationalisation until a better product becomes available.
>It would seem to us that while the scientific validation of these things is
>important to help the greater masses of people accept a reality much larger
>than they had previously considered,=20
The scientific validation of these things is not important to =91help the
greater masses of people accept a reality much larger than they had
previously considered=92, it is absolutely necessary for the acceptance of
such reality. We live in an age where reason, for better or worse, has for
many intelligent people usurped blind faith (more or less) in the sayings of
channelled beings. (I include God in this category). Without some sort of
scientific validation, which also includes a technical understanding of its
effect on the human body, the subject will remain the equivalent of
religious mumbo-jumbo. (eg. the Ancient Egyptians)
> =85.those scientists who are vanguards on the 'front line' so to
>speak, to see that to continue using the overly skeptical point of view=
that
>has been plaguing scientific effort for some time now, is not in the spirit
>of this science they are attempting to be a part of introducing to this=
good
>ol' earth.
Skepticism in science is a concept that has become so corrupted that I would
prefer to use some other term. In modern usage it has come to mean a form of
religious worship of whatever paradigm currently happens to be in vogue.
However, in more general terms, it should have the meaning of inquiry into a
subject, fact, or theory etc, from as many different angles as possible,
trying out and debating all possibilities in order to arrive at the =91best
available guess=92 at =91objective=92 truth, whatever that is. If the=
scientists
you speak of =91are vanguards of the front-line=92, then they will have=
already
passed beyond the infantile stage of modern skepticism that I previously
mention. Don=92t confuse the two. Questioning the facts doesn=92t have to be
negative, it is also part of the process of determining what the facts are.
>In other words, would it not be better to approach this from the=
perspective
>that Hudson really has come upon something highly unusual, and focus the
>effort upon trying to understand where the current paradigms of science=
fall
>short, rather than attempting to continue to prove the old paradigms=
correct?
I would suggest that most people gathered here together think that Hudson
may have come upon something unusual, or they would not be spending time and
money on further inquiries. Unfortunately our beloved guru has for various
reasons withheld much useful information, often contradicts himself, and
worse, has a penchant for dabbling in amateur metaphysics. (There is nothing
unusual in this, this is what every guru in the universe does.) Meanwhile,
taking his word on faith, his followers try to understand where the current
paradigms of science fall short, or perhaps attempt to prove old paradigms
correct. This is, as above, all part of the process of determining what is
actually happening.=20
>As the leading edge of Quantam Physics has shown in recent years, the
>thoughts of the researcher are paramount to the results obtained. If this=
is
>indeed true, then there must be a profound revelation unveiled to the
>researcher in order for the next stage in the developing scientific fields
>to actualize.=20
To what type of profound revelation do you refer? If it is a mystic or
psychic revelation, this won=92t do it for your average scientist, except in=
a
sense of personal intuitive guidance. On the other hand, if you can produce
a quantity of unknown material that fails standard analyses, and most
importantly, stick it in their face, then you are talking business. Then
they can have all the profound revelations they want.
>What this is saying, is that as long as the individuals=20
>involved in the experimentation are holding thoughts of doubt about the=20
>process they are attempting to duplicate, it probably will not occur. Is
>this not what David Hudson has also stated? That all the right chemicals=
and
>formulas etc. would not be enough, that one has to truly BELIEVE it will
>work. Until the scientists and individuals who are attempting to follow in
>David's footsteps come to this realization, the efforts will most likely=
not
>produce what they seek, instead proving their doubting selves correct in=
the
>end, which is what that aspect of themselves (un/subconscious) wants=
anyway.
There is a relevant saying =91Believe and ye shall be saved=92, but also
another, =91By their fruits ye shall know them=92.=20
James Mann <psi@ozemail.com.au>
Anti-sceptic Society
Melbourne, Australia