RE: Re: EG, Isis WPG, Orme

Joe Champion ( discpub@netzone.com )
Sun, 02 Jun 1996 22:28:27 -0700

At 10:25 PM 6/2/96 MDT, you Simeon wrote:

[snip...]

>We feel that your soul Joe, is one of those who has come to change the old
>scientific paradigms, to go where others have not, but to do so is a big
>jump in faith, and it must be faith in something you believe in, that
>extends beyond the normally accepted realm of science, that leads you to the
>goal.
[snip....]

Thank you for the kind remarks. However, I feel that you are far from
understand my position.

If a researcher stood on top of the mountain and proclaimed to know all, he
would be the fool.

Under no circumstances am I qualified to judge the physical, metaphysical or
spiritual benefits of EG or WPG. Although, I feel that you misunderstand
science, for science has no bounds. My quest (or call it challenge) is on
physical proof. It was not I who called your material WPG, EG or ORME's, it
was you and others. Also, it was not I who posted that M.I.T. qualified and
quantified the presence of ORME's in your material.

All that I ask is that you be fair with me and the rest of society and
qualify the reality. If you and others are able to achieve greatness from
the products of your mine, I am ecstatic for you. Yes, I would like to
learn more, but I accept that the teachings may be outside the realm of my
reach.

However, if you have something that presents an awareness, for the sake of
humanity and the critics of the scientific community, just claim it as such.
By doing so, you will not be challenged by people as myself, for who are we
to judge without observation.

Something's will never be understood by mortals, but misrepresentation of
analytical facts only tarnishes your truths. You know your material is good,
but you also know that there is no analytical methodology that will define
your material as WPG or any other metaphysical state.

You believe that you have a mineral that will help people. This is good.
However, why don't you call it a "Spiritual Mine" and forget reporting
statistics in non-realistic laboratory terms (e.g. WPG)?

If you must have belief to make it work, then if one wishes to believe, the
truth will be found within. This being said, if one wishes to believe will
not allow an instrument to read something that is not present, nor
previously observed by the annals of science.
_______________________________
Joe Champion discpub@netzone.com
http://www.netzone.com/~discpub