I am willing to suspend disbelief so long as that trust is not
violated. But it is becoming ever clearer to me that all is not
well here. If we do not do out best to verify any claims that are
verifiable and hold those making such claims responsible then
researchers will avoid this subject like the plague. And, despite
my experiences so far, I still believe that there is something
interesting going on here, whatever it may be.
Every person must demand the truth for themselves.
I have asked Sunshine Services (ISIS WPG) twice now about their
analysis and I have been totally ignored by them [consider this
yet another request -- as I'm sure they would claim they have never
heard anything from me]. I have also asked Ian Kelly of ONE
Enterprises (Etherium Gold) at least three times for this information
and he has not told me anything beyond that it was at "MIT" (which
I obviously already know, that doesn't help). Surely if "MIT" has
confirmed monatomics in those products that the vendors should
easily be able to give me the info about who did it so I can confirm
it with the lab. Why is this not the case?
A Public Challange:
I will buy $250 worth of product from the first company that can
produce a verifiable photocopy of a lab report indicating the
presence of high-spin monatomic iridium, rhodium, platinum, palladium,
mercury, silver, or gold in their product (i.e., I get to call the
lab and speak with someone technical enough to confirm not only
that some assay was done but can speak towards the veracity of the
results -- the claimant must provide all required information so
that I can do this). I will also publicly post my support and
prominently feature that company on my web site.
If a lab can test for high-spin monatomic elements as they claim
then it *should* be a simple enough matter to verify this.
This information is also now on my web site,
in the "Commercial Products" file, off of:
http://monatomic.earth.com/