After listening to Hudson's lectures in Yelm during October/November 1995, I
was later asked by several people in the audience "what did he say?" I found
myself stumbling all over myself searching for the few words needed to answer
the question. I couldn't do it.
I then started a search for a quick summary of Hudson's work and came up
empty handed. So, I wrote my own summary, limited though it may be.
First, I sent it to Hudson for his comments. He did not acknowledge
receiving it. When I called him, he didn't know what I was talking about.
He must not read his mail.
Next, I sent it to the moderated forum for posting. The moderator rejected
it because it was "unsubstantiated" and "opinionated." Without Hudson's
approval, she would not post it.
With these caveats in mind, I now post it to this unmoderated forum for your
review and comments. If any of you wish to improve upon it, please feel free
to do so. I claim no proprietary rights to this material. If you wish, I
can also send this to anyone who requests it in Microsoft Word editable
format for easier editing.
The whole point of this is an attempt to get a scientifically-acceptable
theory of the white powder written. Without an acceptable theory, all we
have are a lot of 4-hour videos and indecipherable patents to refer to.
If you choose to edit, please keep the rest of us informed along the way.
ekarels
--PART.BOUNDARY.0.21340.emout12.mail.aol.com.833129343
Content-ID: <0_21340_833129344@emout12.mail.aol.com.190211>
Content-type: text/plain;
name="THEORY.TXT"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What is the White Powder?
The "white powder" is comprised of a group of elements in a
monatomic state. David Hudson calls them "ORMEs" for
"orbitally-rearranged monatomic elements." This is a new
phase of matter with entirely different physical properties
from normal elements. Conventional chemistry texts have
been of little value in explaining ORMEs. Hudson explains
the concept in his video tapes. However, there are ambiguities,
unclear statements, and contradictions among his various videos.
The intent here is to establishment a common baseline
document on which further discussions can be focused. You
are encouraged to contribute to it.
ORMEs are naturally occurring in certain volcanic soils
dating back to early geological events. Such soils are
prevalent throughout the western United States. Soils
which are considered rich in these elements might contain
up to six percent of this material. The remaining 94 percent
or more of the material is ordinary dirt comprised mainly
of silicon compounds. Initial processing consists of removing
the dirt to get the residue. The residue comprises ORMEs or
the "white powder."
Because of the unique and valuable physical properties of ORMEs,
there has developed a desire to produce them from the metallic
form of the elements. In other words, there are reasons to
convert metallic precious elements to ORMEs. Hudson has found
ways to do this although he reports that the cost of doing so is
prohibitively expensive. The reason for the high cost is due
principally to the high, per-ounce cost of most precious metals.
The process itself is tedious but is not particularly expensive.
But it is much less expensive to start with natural material and
to then "simply" remove the ordinary elements from the natural
material to get pure ORMEs matter.
Because the percentage of ORMEs in certain volcanic soils is so
high (up to 6 percent) in comparison with normal high-grade ore
(up to 0.0015 percent), there is considerable interest by mining
companies in the technology required to convert ORMEs to their
metallic form. The yield increases by a factor of 4000. So far,
no mining company has figured out how to do this. The processing
technique is highly proprietary and will not be disclosed,
according to Hudson. Hudson has stated that his sole interest
is in the monatomic form of these elements; he has no interest
in producing the metallic form of the precious elements. Further,
Hudson states that there is never a need to convert monatomic
materials to their metallic state during the manufacturing process.
The only time a conversion is required is to allow standard analytical
chemical procedures to be used to identify a small sample of the
material.
Hudson further states that he has the technology to separate the
monatomic material into the various elements for specific
commercial applications without conversion to the metallic state.
That is, he can produce the white powder of gold, the white powder of
palladium, the white powder of osmium, etc without conversions. He
also stated that the white powder which will be delivered to the
members of his spiritual foundation would be refined but "unseparated"
monatomic material. That is, it would contain all the monatomic
elements in their naturally-occurring proportions. It is his intention
to not make the white powder of gold uniquely available to the
spiritual membership although the naturally-occuring percentage of
the white powder of gold would be included in the delivered mixture. In
other words, the gold would not be removed from the mixture prior to
delivery to the spiritual membership.
Hudson's lack of interest in the metallic form of the precious metals is
not entirely altruistic. His spreadsheet analyses have shown that he
can profit more by licensing in perpetuity the white powder for
industrial applicatons than by selling the bullion on the precious
metals market. There is also a much lower security risk because the
white powder itself has no market value to thieves.
The Physics Behind it All
If you look in any physics or chemistry text book for an explanation
of what's going on here, you will look in vain. Nuclear physicists
are just now getting a glimmer of an idea of the phenomena as
explained in recent issues of such magazines as "Scientific
American" and in various scientific journals. Based on Hudson's
videos, an attempt will be made to explain the phenomena in
layman's terms. (Not everyone is a nuclear physicist so the following
simplified explanations may cause some physicists to wince from
time-to-time. If you think you can explain it more clearly and more
accurately to a layman, please feel free to give it a try.)
The Bohr Model of the Atom.- Neils Bohr explained many years ago
the structure of an atom as having a nucleus comprised of positively-
charged protons and neutrally-charged neutrons surrounded by a cloud
of electrons. These are extremely tiny particles of matter. If
you were to compare an atom with the solar system, the nucleus
would be the sun and the electrons would be the planets.
There are two forces at work within the nucleus. One is the
"strong" force which is the glue which holds all the protons
and neutrons together. The other force is the "coulomb" force
(electromagnetic in nature) which works to force the protons to
repel each other. Within the tiny geometry of a spherical nucleus,
the strong force is much stronger than the coulomb force, thereby
holding the nucleus together despite the weaker coulomb force which
works to break apart the nucleus. The strong force operates at
short distances whereas the coulomb force operates at longer
distances. Thus, within the dimensions of an atomic sphere,
the strong force prevails, holding the nucleus together. If the
nucleus becomes physically deformed, the coulomb force might prevail,
causing the nucleus to disintegrate.
There are several bands of negatively-charged electrons which
"rotate" around the nucleus. There are the same number of
electrons surrounding the nucleus as there are protons within
the nucleus. The outer band of electrons is called the "valence"
band. Electrons in this band are called the "valence" electrons.
These are the electrons which are involved in chemical reactions.
If the outer band of electrons is "full", the element is quite
stable. If the outer band is not "full", the element is prone to
interact with other atoms of the same element or with other elements
to form chemical compounds such that the outer band is "filled."
The number of electrons in the outer valence band varies depending
upon the number of protons in the nucleus. Periodic tables
identify the number of valence electrons that each element has.
Neutrons and protons are rougly equivalent in size and weight
whereas the electron is so small as to be almost indistinguishable
from pure energy with virtually no discernible mass.
Typically, the atoms of metallic elements group themselves in sort
of a crystalline lattice network whereby each atom shares electrons
with other atoms of the same element. This is a relatively stable
arrangement where the various nuclei are held in position by the
forces of their neighboring nuclei. All metals share this
charateristic but with a variety of crystalline configurations.
It is difficult to disturb this structure; hence the physical
rigidity of metals.
So far, we have not strayed from conventional chemistry and you
can read the above description (more precisely, perhaps) in any
college chemistry text. Now, we will move into new territory.
Phases of Matter.- Classical science teaches us that the three
phases of matter are gasses, liquids, and solids. Some solids
crystallize into a lattice structure with metallic characteristics.
What classical science does not teach is that there is, in
fact, another phase of matter called "monatomic." These
materials have ceramic-like properties.
Microclusters.- Nuclear physicists recently discovered that
the atoms of some elements exist in microclusters. These are
tiny groups of between 2 and 100 atoms. If you have more than
a specified number of atoms in a microcluster, these atoms will
aggregate into a lattice structure with metallic properties. If
you have fewer than that critical number of atoms, that microcluster
will disaggregate into monatomic atoms with ceramic properties.
Monataomic atoms are not held in position by the forces of their
neighboring atoms as they are by atoms in a lattice structure.
Most elements require a minimum of 14 atoms before they exhibit
metallic characteristics. The critical number of atoms for
rhodium is 9 and the critical number of atoms for gold is just 2.
The significance of this is that if you have two or more gold
atoms in a microcluster, it will exhibit metallic characteristics.
However, if you have 9 or fewer atoms in a microcluster of rhodium
atoms, the microcluster will spontaneously disaggregate to become
a group of monatomic rhodium atoms. Apparently, the only force
which binds monatomic atoms together is gravity. More insight is
needed in this area.
It has been observed that the valence electrons of monatomic
elements are unavailable for chemical reactions. This means
that monatomic atoms are chemically inert and have many of the
physical properties of ceramic materials. Because the valence
electrons are unavailable, it is impossible to use standard
analytical chemistry techniques to identify a monatomic element.
These are very recent discoveries and the full implications
have yet to be evaluated by the scientific community. You won't
find this discussed in textbooks yet.
In general, a metallic element is physically stable and is a
relatively good conductor of both heat and electricity and is
usually chemically active (metals typically rust and/or corrode.)
To the contrary, monatomic atoms of the same element behave more
like a ceramic in that they are generally a poor conductor of both
heat and electricity and are chemically inert. In addition,
monatomic elements exhibit the characteristics of superconductors
at room temperature.
(It may sound like a contradiction to say that monatomic
elements are both perfect insulators and perfect conductors,
but it isn't. A superconductor will not allow an electrical
potential to exist within it. Because conventional electricity requires
a potential difference for current to flow, conventional electricity
cannot flow in a superconductor, hence it is an insulator. However,
current will flow with no resistance if the current is
coupled to the superconductor at a resonant frequency.)
Russian scientists explicitely state in their literature that atoms
in lattice structures are metallic in nature and that these same
atoms in the monatomic state are ceramic in nature.
Monatomic atoms have been observed to exist in all the heavy elements
in the center of the periodic table. These are the elements which
have "half-filled" bands of valence electrons and include the
following elements. Their atomic numbers are given in
parenthesis. (The atomic number represents the number of protons
in the nucleus.)
Cobalt (27), Nickel (28), Copper (29), Ruthenium (44), Rhodium (45),
Palladium (46), Silver (47), Osmium (76), Iridium (77), Platinum (78),
Gold (79), and Mercury (80). Other metallic elements in adjacent
parts of the periodic table have also been observed to exist in
microclusters.
Because the atoms of monatomic elements are not held in a rigid
lattice network, their physical characteristics are quite different
from atoms which are locked in the lattice. Thus, it is the
grouping of atoms which defines the physical characteristics
of the element; not just the number of neutrons and protons
in the nucleus as previously believed. If you don't have a
lattice network, you don't have a metal even though the atoms
of the two forms of matter are identical!
The implication here is that there is an entirely new phase of
matter lurking about the universe. This phase of matter is
comprised of monatomic elements; a heretofore unknown phase
of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because
they are inert and undetectable by normal analytical techniques.
This might be nothing but a scientific curiosity except for
the fact that these same scientists now believe that up to 5
percent of the earth's mass is comprised of monatomic elements.
This is a huge amount of heretofore unknown matter, existing
undiscovered right under our noses since the beginning of time.
At the very least, it should be an embarrassment to the scientific
establishment.
Limitations of Analytical Chemistry.- How could it be that up to
five percent of the earth's matter could be comprised of material
which heretofore has been completely undiscovered? It has to do
with the theory of analytical chemistry. None of the detection
techniques of analytical chemistry can detect monatomic
elements. They can only detect elements by interacting with
their valence electrons. Because the valence electrons of
monatomic atoms are unavailable, the atoms are unidentifiable.
To detect a monatomic element requires that you first convert it
from its monatomic state to its normal state to allow the element
to be detected with conventional instrumentation. As a result,
this phase of matter has existed as a stealth material right under the
noses of scientists without detection until quite recently.
Peculiarities of Monatomic Elements.- The monatomic form of an
element exhibits physical characteristics which are entirely
different from its metallic form. These differences are currently
being investigated by nuclear physicists so it isn't possible to
make an exhaustive list of the differences at this time. A few of the
differences will be noted. Readers are encouraged to add to this list.
The physical appearance of the monatomic form of an element is
that of a fluffy white powder with a fluorescent-like glow.
This powder behaves as a superconductor at room tempeature,
giving it very interesting properties. Because it is a
superconductor, it tends to "ride" on the magnetic field of the earth,
giving it the powers of levitation. It has been found to be very
difficult to determine the specific gravity of monatomic elements
because the weight varies widely with temperature and the magnetic
environment. Under some circumstances, monatomic elements weigh
less than zero! That is, a box full of monatomic matter has been
observed to weigh less than the empty box. This is a hard concept
to swallow for those who say they only believe what they see.
These elements have the characteristics similar to that of porcelain
in that they do not chemically react with anything and are
very tough, durable, and heat resistant.
Transmutation.- According to recent articles in "Scientific American,"
monatomic elements tend to be prone to transmutation as follows:
Normal nuclei are spherical in shape. They are held in this shape
by the competing forces of all the neighboring atoms of a lattice
network. Monatomic elements, on the other hand, have no neighbors
to keep them out of trouble. Because the valence band of electrons
are only half filled, these heavy elements are inherently physically
unstable in the monatomic state. (Note a distinction between being
chemically inert and being physically unstable. Monatomic elements
are both inert and physically unstable.)
You might compare a monatomic atom with a single-cylinder gasoline
engine which runs with quite a bit of vibration. As you add cylinders
to this engine, the vibration is dampened out until you can hardly
detect any vibration by the time you reach 8-cylinders.
Because monatomic atoms "vibrate" more than atoms in a lattice network,
their nuclei tend to deform into an "oblong" shape similar to that of
a bowling pin. So what, you say?
This is where the "strong" and the "coulomb" (electromagnetic) forces
come into play. When working within the dimensions of a spherical
nucleus, the "strong" force of an atom overwhelms the weaker coulomb
forces, maintaining the atom in a stable configuration. But, when a
monatomic atom starts to vibrate, it tends to be deformed into the
elongated shape of a bowlng pin. If this shape is caried to an
extreme whereby the atom is twice as long as it is wide, then the
coulomb force overwhelms the strong force and the atom spontaneously
disintegrates into two smaller elements accompanied by a burst of
radiation. (This is clled spontaneous fission.) Of course, most
monatomic atoms never reach the critical level of deformity which
causes them to disintegrate. They simply exist is a steady state of
less than critical deformity.
"Scientific American" recently published an article which described
how quite a number of heavy elements had been observed to spontaneously
split (fission) into smaller atoms. This is indeed the stuff of alchemis=
ts.
Not much is known about the cirucmstances which contribute to this
spontaneous transmutation. About all that can be said at this early
date is that spontaneous transmutation has been observed to exist.
It is no longer a matter of whether transmutation does nor does not
exist but under what circumstances such transmutation occurs.
It is truly amazing that nature can offer two identical atoms
(identical numbers of protons, electrons, and neutrons) with such
different physical characteristics. The only difference between
the two is the manner in which groups of atoms are bonded together.
Much more will be discovered about this in the near future as the
nuclear physicists continue to pursue these most interesting mysteries.
=1A=
--PART.BOUNDARY.0.21340.emout12.mail.aol.com.833129343--