Re: A Starting Point
Joe Champion ( discpub@netzone.com )
Sun, 26 May 1996 09:30:28 -0700
>Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 09:28:14 -0700
>To: EKarels@aol.com
>From: Joe Champion <discpub@netzone.com>
>Subject: Re: A Starting Point
>
>At 10:38 AM 5/26/96 -0400, you wrote:
>>Content-ID: <0_22215_833121526@emout10.mail.aol.com.117563>
>>Content-type: text/plain
>>
>>You sound a bit frustrated........
>
>No Everett I am not frustrated. I am tired people trying to make something
out of nothing.
>
>Is there something unusal occurring from Hudson's observations? Without a
question the answer is -- yes. Is the occurrence monatomic? The absolute
answer is -- NO!
>
>How can I state this? Easy, for something to be something you must have
scientific basis. Hypotheses were developed by philosphers and scientists
in an attempt to explain the basis of atomic science. These hypothesis were
later proven by development of laboratory tests.
>
>Hudson makes claims. He makes these claims from observations. He, nor any
of the scientists, researchers or technicians associated with the differing
observations have porvided the basis of the emperical data observed. This
being the - MATHEMATICAL MODEL.
>
>Until a mathematical model is developed, no one can build a devise (e.g.
ORME's identifier).
>
>Emperical data is substance, for it has been observed. Explanation of the
event is up to the ability of the observer to qualify as many parameters as
possible associated with the pre and post phenomena.
>
>To remove Daivid's claims from those of physic occurences and place them in
the journals of science you must have the ability to:
>
>1. Explain the observation in mathematical terms.
>
>2. Have others replicate the process independent of the inventor.
>
>3. Develop technology which will independently identify the phenomena.
>
>To my knowledge the above has not occurred. At the point in time it does,
David will be World famous and the recipient of the Nobel Prize.
>
>As a friend, I hope that he can achieve the above.
>
>____________________
>
>In response to your paper "What is White Powder," allow me to say you did
a phenomenal job in its preparation.
>
>With your permission, I would like to post it in entirity on the Internet.
>
>To do so I require the following:
>
>Full name of author:
>
>Date of preparation:
>
>References as to which lecture the quotes from David were acquired:
>
>Inclusive to the above if you would send it to me as an attached Word file,
I will post it this weekend.
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>