Re: Channelled Information
Dan York ( danyork@iadfw.net )
Sun, 26 May 96 03:16:40 -0500 (CDT)
At 02:24 PM 5/25/96 -0400, you wrote:
>There is a wealth of channelled information on the substance which we refer
>to as the white powder.
>
>For reasons I do not understand, it was considered to be "off limits" on the
>moderated forum.
>
>Is it appropriate to post and discuss channelled information about the white
>powder on this forum? Of course, any information presented should be clearly
>labelled as being from a channelled source so the reader can make his/her own
>judgments as to the validity of the information presented. It might even be
>appropriate to identify the name of the channel. Most members of this forum
>are intelligent, responsible adults who have a need to know the source of any
>information presented - factual, opinion, channelled, or otherwise. When
>dealing on the fringes of known science, it gets pretty hard to discern the
>difference.
Yes it is appropriate to post channeled information. I agree wholeheartedly
that it should be clearly labeled as being channeled but it is appropriate
for this list.
I am personally very skeptical of channeled information. I can not prove it
is not valid but it would take a heap of convincing for me personally to
consider channeled information anything more than interesting conjecture.
Having said that I still would like to hear what comes through in this
channeled information.
Dan