Re: "Executive Summary"
Dan York ( danyork@iadfw.net )
Sun, 26 May 96 02:20:21 -0500 (CDT)
At 02:24 PM 5/25/96 -0400, ekarels wrote:
>After listening to several of Hudson's lectures, reading the
>transcripts of others, and reading his patents, I came to realize that there
>was no short quick summary of what the white powder was all about. After his
>lecture in Yelm in November 1995, several people asked me what the lecture
>was about. I had a hard time explaining it in just a few words. Hudson has
>commented that there is no short way to understand the subject; you have to
>listen to 4 to 7 hours of videos/tape to figure out what is going on. For
>most people, they still don't know very much more after watching it all.
>
>Well, there are a lot of other pretty complex subjects which can be briefly
>explained such that the gist of the idea can be transferred from one
>intelligent person to another without spending 4 hours doing it. I set about
>to write a short "Executive Summary" of what the white powder was all about.
>
>I submitted it to the moderated forum but it was rejected because it was not
>endorsed by Hudson thereby making it a forbidden "opinion" piece.
I would like to see what you have come up with. Any time I attempt to
explain about David Hudson and this White Gold to someone new it is a real
problem. I have not found a short and simple way to introduce someone to
the subject. Please post your opinion piece to the list and lets see what
everyone thinks about it.
Dan