For reasons I do not understand, it was considered to be "off limits" on the
moderated forum.
Is it appropriate to post and discuss channelled information about the white
powder on this forum? Of course, any information presented should be clearly
labelled as being from a channelled source so the reader can make his/her own
judgments as to the validity of the information presented. It might even be
appropriate to identify the name of the channel. Most members of this forum
are intelligent, responsible adults who have a need to know the source of any
information presented - factual, opinion, channelled, or otherwise. When
dealing on the fringes of known science, it gets pretty hard to discern the
difference.
If channelled information is not appropriate, please state your reasons.
Let me give you one reason why channelled information should be admitted:
Inventors get their ideas from "flashes of inspiration", the source of which
is generally unknown to the receiver. i.e. "The idea just popped into my
head!"
Based on that inspiration, the inventor then proceeds to develop the
invention into a useful "something" in the "real" world.
Channelled information is similar to these "flashes of inspiration." When an
inventor (or scientist, etc) is stumped, a few flashes of inspiration might
be all that's required to "get him over the hump." Wouldn't it be nice if
something popped into your head which said you were "on the right track" or
that "this is a dead-end, buddy, back off." For that reason alone, I would
think that channelled information should be admitted on a forum such as this
which is exploring the fringes of known science.
Please comment on this if you have an "opinion" or otherwise.
ekarels