Well, there are a lot of other pretty complex subjects which can be briefly
explained such that the gist of the idea can be transferred from one
intelligent person to another without spending 4 hours doing it. I set about
to write a short "Executive Summary" of what the white powder was all about.
I submitted it to the moderated forum but it was rejected because it was not
endorsed by Hudson thereby making it a forbidden "opinion" piece.
If anyone on this forum is interested, I would be happy to post it for your
review and comments. I have no pride of authorship of this "Summary" and if
anyone can make any constructive suggestions to it, please feel free to do
so. To my knowledge, such a document currently does not exist and, in my
"opinion," it is sorely needed so all of us will eventually (in a few weeks
or months) have
something we can pass out to newcomers who might be interested in this
subject. Then, in must a few minutes, they will have some understanding of
what the "white powder" subject is all about.
There is also another purpose to the summary:
Hudson did not refer to notes during his lectures. As a result, he made
numerous contradictory statements among his various lectures. By writing a
brief summary, these contradictions came to light. I did discuss some of
these contradictions with Hudson and he explained them away by telling me
which were inadvertent misstatements due to his not using notes. Perhaps
others on the forum can help make the summary a better explanation of
Hudson's work.
This summary is not intended to be a substitute for the excellent
investigative work of the various scientists, such as Joe Champion, who are
working very hard to confirm Hudson's work. They are to be commended for
their great efforts because confirmation is sorely needed. This is simply an
effort to get a brief writeup which we can all agree is reasonably accurate
for newcomers to read to bring them up to speed without having to watch a
4-hour video.
Comments please.
ekarels